Personally, I think it is funny. The notion of a bunch of "anonymous" strangers in costumes are going to "rescue" members of a "cult" who have been "disconnected" from society ----is so ridiculous-- that I feel it is my moral obligation to point this out.
The reason for the gratuitous quoting here is that all of their claims are based upon speculation, rumor, and myth. The entire "operation" is laughably misguided.
Here is a facinating article contrasting a hypothetical Radical Scientology Mindset with a Radical Anti-Scientology Mindset:
ARTICLE HERE
People are "saved" when they join the group VS
People are "saved" when they quit the group
All that matters is to get people in the group and prevent them from leaving VS
All that matters is to get people out from the group and prevent them from joining
It is urgent to save the planet from evil VS
It is urgent to save the planet from Scientology
The Scientology tech is the most precious asset of Humanity VS
The Scientology tech is a dangerous mind-control technique
In Scientology you experience super-human spiritual awakening VS
In Scientology you experience sub-human mind-control numbing
L. Ron Hubbard is a genius and a great humanitarian VS
L. Ron Hubbard is a psychopathic cult leader and a pathological liar
Society conspires against the most Holy group on the planet VS
The evil cults conspire against the very basis of society
Special means should be allowed to defend the tech against SPs VS
Special means should be allowed to defend society against Scientology
Dissenters and critics are dangerous traitors or spies VS
Dissenters and critics are dangerous cult apologists or OSA agents
No comments:
Post a Comment